Prompt 1 min read

Direction of Thinking

Meaning is a uniquely embodied phenomenon

Black-and-white photograph of snowy mountains and a valley
Source

Thinking, like communication, has a direction. It can be towards others, which will often also be towards clarity or towards meaning. Meaning is a uniquely embodied phenomenon. We can share meaning, of course, but we would share the tentacles of the source. The meaning itself is alive in us. No one needs to ask you to care about something you find meaningful; the meaning is the fire that burns and keeps this interesting to you. Finding the meaning in the things we already do, or pursuing more meaningful activities, is the foundation of self-actualization (being seen by the world the way you see yourself).

This personal endeavor has many day-to-day aspects. You can’t find meaning (/value) by talking to others because, more often than not, talking to others looks for clarity and collaboration. So while we could produce wonderful thinking, it will not give us insights into what drives our attention. Tactically, meaning waits for you to find and assign language to it in the socially awkward spaces that resist median articulation; it is a particular complexity, a unique personal constellation of ideas.

Newsletter

Critical Business School, by email: essays, prompts, and new podcast episodes.

More
There's No Such Thing as a General Audience
"General audience" is a comforting fiction. It promises you can make something valuable without it meaning anything to anyone in particular. You can't. We
Side Projects Are Killing Your Practice
Side projects are killing your practice. They make you discount yourself and your ideas and get in the way of self-authorship. When you move with conviction but
AI Literacy
How I built the new Critical Business School site with Claude
One week, one conversation, and a site that brings the school, the writing, the podcast and the library together. A list of everything that went into it.
AI Literacy
The Same Tools, In Different Hands
Everyone now works with the same tools: the same models, the same interfaces, and often the same prompts, passed around like recipes. More and more, the outputs look